One Woman minute. Woman Landscape in Madrid.
Student Evaluations
sTuDeNt EvAlUaTiOnS (after the course and about the course)
One woman minute. Woman landscape in Madrid:
From Level of
Previous
backgraundClosely
followed
descriptionSufficient
course
lengthWeel adapted
AV/computer
equipmentSufficient
documen-tationPedagogical
methodsValue of
technical
visitsHeavy
workloadInterest in European
activitiesWelcome by host
institutionGlobally PM 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 Strong
aspectswe've understood the real life style of Madrid; how the people think, live, relation themselves with the others... We were in group with students from other country; no group with same nationality. Weak aspects Improve-ments Future
topicsSomething like this 'cos is the right way to learn something from other countries. Comments CVUT 4 3 4 5 5 5 4 3 4 5 4 Strong
aspectsmeeting new people and getting to know how they work Weak aspects we spent many hours at school working on our projects, we had little free time Improve-ments to organize time better Future
topicsworking with 3D programme, ecological and low energy building - up Comments CVUT 3 2 3 3 4 3 3 5 3 3 3 Strong
aspectsit was fun and ist realy educative in english and in cooperation Weak aspects weird theme of the course, not what i expected Improve-ments i dont know Future
topicsmore about urbanism what i expected from this course, this was sociological and no one noticed it before comming Comments everything around was good ITU 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 1 4 4 4 Strong
aspectsassistants and the professor were really helpful. also it was enjoyable. Weak aspects it was a very intensive course for a week, it was difficult to see the city and attend the course at the same time. Improve-ments Future
topicsgraphic design ecological housing urban design 3d computer programme Comments trip to a near small city for a day AUT 4 5 4 5 5 3 5 3 4 4 Strong
aspectsWeak aspects Improve-ments Future
topicscourses that have to do more with architecture and design Comments CVUT 5 4 2 5 5 5 5 5 4 3 5 Strong
aspectsGreat experience! Thanks to Atxu Weak aspects We didn't understand what is the course about until we came to Madrid Improve-ments Future
topicsmore or less the same Comments BEST people did great job PM 3 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 Strong
aspectsUse of many examples and media documentation during the lessons, taken from different backgrounds and cultural sides. Constant evaluation and comparison of the works between each group. Weak aspects Many difficulties in working with students who didn't come from architectural faculties, because of the very targeted skills needed for the course. Load of the work really too heavy, we spent almost all the days, the whole day till 10PM, doing the activities. Improve-ments Ask a little less load of work; provide more technical material, such as videocameras, to the people who don't have it. Future
topicsArchitecture, photography, landscape projecting, construction Comments People who came from Paris just because the whole courses were free for them weren't enough motivated and willing to work and cooperate with the other ones. CVUT 4 5 3 3 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 Strong
aspects
Weak aspects Improve-ments Future
topicsArchitecture, Social problems, Art, History Comments ENPC 2 4 3 4 3 4 3 5 4 4 3 Strong
aspects
Weak aspects Improve-ments Future
topicsComments PM 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Strong
aspectsa fantastic community creation between students from all of europe, searching and experimenting the same situation, all together! Weak aspects is too short!!!!!! Improve-ments Future
topicsarchitecture, design Comments continue to do it! PM 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 Strong
aspects
Weak aspects Improve-ments Future
topicsComments PM 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 5 5 4 Strong
aspectsthe themes faced in it Weak aspects to many things planned for students Improve-ments a better time organization Future
topicsarchitectural and engineering subject Comments It was a great experience!!! DELFT 5 2 4 5 5 5 3 4 4 5 4 Strong
aspectsTeaching methods and focus on presentation skills Weak aspects architectural aspect Improve-ments accepting no students without architectural background in the course will improve the level of discussion between the architecture students. Future
topicsComments make them bigger and more related to the 'normal' student life in Madrid. CVUT 3 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 3 5 5 Strong
aspectsgreat teachers on the course, interesting work Weak aspects 10 to 12 hours per day we spent working on the project for the course Improve-ments hard to say, it was really cool Future topics high energy physics Comments it was nice, good organized